The Best RAG Technique Yet? Anthropic’s Contextual Retrieval Explained!
Summary
Anthropic has introduced a powerful retrieval mechanism called contextual retrieval, which, when paired with re-ranking, has proven to be incredibly effective. This technique involves utilizing chunking strategies and embedding similarity to enhance the retrieval accuracy of information. By automatically adding contextual details using Language Model (LLM), RAG systems are optimized, resulting in significant improvement in retrieval accuracy and performance. Considerations for customization include embedding models, chunk sizes, and evaluation methodologies to ensure the system works efficiently. The importance of RAG in the context of long context LLMs is emphasized, showcasing its relevance in enhancing information retrieval processes.
Chapters
Introduction to Contextual Retrieval
Understanding RAG Working
Limitations of Keyword-Based Search Mechanisms
Contextual Information in Chunk Creation
Performance Improvement Expectations
Optimizing RAG Systems
Considerations for Customization
Cost Efficiency and Prompt Caching
Replicating Results and Vector DB Creation
Accuracy Metrics and Contextualized Embeddings
Relevance of RAG in Modern Context
Introduction to Contextual Retrieval
Anthropic has introduced a new retrieval mechanism called contextual retrieval, which has shown to be the best performing technique when combined with re-ranking. It is described more as a chunking strategy than a new RAG technique.
Understanding RAG Working
Exploration of how RAG works, including computing embeddings, storing them in a vector store, runtime processes, and response generation based on embedding similarity.
Limitations of Keyword-Based Search Mechanisms
Discussion on the limitations of keyword-based search mechanisms in retrieving specific information, with examples highlighting the lack of contextual information and potential inaccuracies.
Contextual Information in Chunk Creation
Importance of including contextual information in chunk creation and the recommendation to add contextual details automatically using LLM to enhance retrieval accuracy.
Performance Improvement Expectations
Overview of the performance improvements achieved through Anthropic's scientific study on contextual retrieval, showing significant enhancements in retrieval accuracy.
Optimizing RAG Systems
Recommendations for optimizing RAG systems by incorporating keyword-based search mechanisms, dense embedding models, and re-rankers to achieve better performance.
Considerations for Customization
Factors to consider for customization, such as embedding models, the number of chunks to return, and measurement methodologies for evaluating system performance.
Cost Efficiency and Prompt Caching
Discussion on cost implications of LLM usage and the benefits of prompt caching in reducing costs significantly.
Replicating Results and Vector DB Creation
Explanation of replicating results by using BM25, re-ranking, and the voyage embedding model along with insights on creating the vector database efficiently.
Accuracy Metrics and Contextualized Embeddings
Analysis of accuracy metrics in retrieving relevant chunks using contextualized embeddings, showcasing improvements in retrieval accuracy for top chunks with added contextual information.
Relevance of RAG in Modern Context
Highlighting the relevance of RAG in the era of long context LLMs and its significance in information retrieval processes.
FAQ
Q: What is the new retrieval mechanism introduced by Anthropic?
A: The new retrieval mechanism introduced by Anthropic is called contextual retrieval.
Q: How is contextual retrieval described in comparison to a new RAG technique?
A: Contextual retrieval is described more as a chunking strategy than a new RAG technique.
Q: What are some key processes involved in how RAG works?
A: Some key processes involved in how RAG works include computing embeddings, storing them in a vector store, runtime processes, and response generation based on embedding similarity.
Q: What are the limitations of keyword-based search mechanisms in retrieving specific information?
A: Keyword-based search mechanisms lack contextual information, leading to potential inaccuracies in retrieving specific information.
Q: What is the importance of including contextual information in chunk creation according to the discussion?
A: Including contextual information in chunk creation is important to enhance retrieval accuracy.
Q: What recommendations are provided for optimizing RAG systems?
A: Recommendations for optimizing RAG systems include incorporating keyword-based search mechanisms, dense embedding models, and re-rankers to achieve better performance.
Q: What factors should be considered for customization in RAG systems?
A: Factors to consider for customization in RAG systems include embedding models, the number of chunks to return, and measurement methodologies for evaluating system performance.
Q: What is the significance of prompt caching in RAG systems?
A: Prompt caching in RAG systems significantly reduces costs.
Q: How can results be replicated in RAG systems?
A: Results can be replicated by using BM25, re-ranking, and the voyage embedding model along with creating the vector database efficiently.
Q: What is highlighted as the relevance of RAG in the era of long context LLMs?
A: RAG is highlighted as relevant in the era of long context LLMs due to its significance in information retrieval processes.
Get your own AI Agent Today
Thousands of businesses worldwide are using Chaindesk Generative
AI platform.
Don't get left behind - start building your
own custom AI chatbot now!